Original RR Chauhan monogramOriginal RR Chauhan monogramRAKSHIT RAJ CHAUHANADVOCATE & LEGAL COUNSEL
Home / Case note

Case note

Criminal procedure.
A question of standing.

Kusum Sharma v. State of Haryana · CRM-M-19015-2026 (O&M) · 20 April 2026

20

APRIL 2026

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Kusum Sharma v. State of Haryana

CRM-M-19015-2026 (O&M)

The published order records Rakshit Raj Chauhan as counsel for the petitioner in proceedings seeking expeditious disposal of a complaint.

Before
Justice Surya Partap Singh
Decision
20 April 2026
Recorded role
Advocate for the petitioner

What the Court decided

The petition was dismissed as not maintainable at that stage for want of locus standi. The Court also directed that the order be sent to the District & Sessions Judge, Gurugram, to look into the allegation that the Section 156(3) application had remained pending for more than five years.

Read the published order

Source: Published High Court order, reproduced by Indian Kanoon.

This is a brief account of the published order, not a substitute for reading it. The petition’s dismissal and the direction concerning alleged delay are separate parts of the decision.